Fritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / CC-BY 4.0

Introduction

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and its increasingly profound impact on society call for a careful examination of AI ethics. In this blog post, we will explore two innovative approaches to building ethical AI models, focusing on Anthropic and OpenAI as case studies. We'll take a close look at the principles and methods these companies use to create more responsible AI systems, discuss some of the potential pitfalls and criticisms, and explore real-world applications and future directions.

Anthropic's Constitutional AI

Anthropic has developed a unique approach to AI ethics called Constitutional AI. This method aims to make AI language models behave more precisely by adhering to a set of principles. Although the specifics have not been made public, Anthropic states that these principles are grounded in beneficence (maximizing positive impact), non-maleficence (avoiding harmful advice), and autonomy (respecting freedom of choice). These principles align with the well-regarded Hartford Principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013).

This innovative approach allows for large language models to act more responsibly by tweaking the underlying principles to guide their behavior. In turn, this flexibility offers a promising avenue for the development of AI systems that are more accountable and aligned with human values.

OpenAI's Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback

OpenAI, on the other hand, uses a method called reinforcement learning with human feedback to build ethical AI models. This process involves a team of humans who review and rate model outputs, with these ratings informing the model whether its output was good or bad. This feedback is then used to improve the model iteratively. A similar approach was employed at Fair Shake, where reinforcement learning was used to train the model on legal claim assignments it had previously assigned incorrectly.

However, this method has faced criticism due to the low wages paid to human workers involved in large-scale moderation tasks. OpenAI reportedly employs a team in Kenya where workers are paid between $1.25 and $2 per day to review AI outputs, which can sometimes include disturbing content. This raises questions about the ethical implications of relying on low-paid labor to uphold the ethical standards of AI models (Metz, 2021).

Real-world Applications

Ethical AI models developed by Anthropic and OpenAI are already being applied in various industries, such as healthcare, finance, education, and entertainment. For example, AI systems are used to help diagnose medical conditions, personalize learning experiences, detect fraudulent activities, and create more engaging content (Topol, 2019; Popenici & Kerr, 2017; Jagtiani & Lemieux, 2018).

Challenges and Limitations

Building ethical AI models is not without challenges and limitations. These include the potential for biases in training data, difficulties in defining ethical principles, and the risk of AI models being misused by malicious actors (Crawford, 2016; Mittelstadt et al., 2016). Addressing these challenges requires a concerted effort from AI developers, policymakers, and stakeholders to ensure ethical considerations are addressed effectively.

Collaboration and Partnerships

Both Anthropic and OpenAI recognize the importance of collaboration and have participated in various initiatives to promote AI ethics. OpenAI, for instance, is a founding member of the Partnership on AI, a collaborative effort that brings together industry leaders, academics, and non-profit organizations to explore best practices and research on AI ethics (Partnership on AI, n.d.).

Alternative Approaches to AI Ethics

Other approaches to building ethical AI models include using explainable AI (XAI), incorporating fairness, accountability, and transparency (FAT) principles, and adopting AI auditing processes (Arrieta et al., 2020; Barocas & Selbst, 2016; Jobin et al., 2019). Comparing and contrasting these approaches with those employed by Anthropic and OpenAI could offer a broader perspective on AI ethics. For example, XAI can help improve the interpretability and understanding of AI decisions, while FAT principles focus on addressing issues such as bias, discrimination, and opacity in AI systems.

Future Directions

Speculating on future developments in ethical AI, we can expect emerging trends such as the integration of AI ethics principles into AI governance frameworks, increased focus on interdisciplinary research, and the development of new methodologies to ensure AI systems remain aligned with human values (Floridi & Cowls, 2019; Whittlestone et al., 2019). As ethical AI models evolve and improve over time, they will continue to shape industries, policymaking, and research.

Conclusion

Both Anthropic and OpenAI offer valuable insights into building ethical AI models. Anthropic's Constitutional AI demonstrates how fundamental principles can guide AI behavior, while OpenAI's reinforcement learning with human feedback highlights the importance of iterative improvement and human oversight. However, the latter approach also raises concerns about the ethical treatment of human workers involved in the AI development process.

As AI continues to grow in prominence and impact, the need for ethical AI models becomes increasingly vital. By learning from case studies like Anthropic and OpenAI, exploring alternative approaches, and considering future directions, we can strive to build AI systems that are more responsible, accountable, and ultimately, beneficial to society.

References

Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., ... & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82-115.

Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671-732.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.

Crawford, K. (2016). Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 77-92.

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).

Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2018). Fintech: The impact on consumers and regulatory responses. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 1-6.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.

Metz, C. (2021, October 4). A.I. ethicist at Google urges workers in Kenya to unionize. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/04/technology/google-ai-ethicist-kenya.html

Mittelstadt, B., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21.

OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 System Card. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4-system-card.pdf

Partnership on AI. (n.d.). About us. https://partnershiponai.org/about/